LEAD STORY,
DAILY MAIL 13 JULY 1999
Banks and Building Societies were accused yesterday of raking in
millions in extra profits at the expense of homebuyers.
The Consumers Association says they have failed to pass on the
full benefit of interest rate cuts.
The Bank of England Base Rate fell 2.5 per cent between July 1 last year
and July 1 this year from 7.5 per cent to 5 per cent. But average mortgage rates
have gone down just 1.79 per cent from 8.61 per cent to 6.82. That means that the
profit margin has risen from 1.11 per cent to 1.82 per cent in less than a year, bringing
lenders extra millions.
The Association estimates that a family with a £100,000 mortgage is
losing out to the tune of £59 a month or £708 a year.
Now there are demands for a punitive windfall tax on big banks, coupled
with a move to bring the industry under the new Financial Services Authority, rather than
leaving it to a voluntary code of practice.
CA mortgage expert Mick McAteer said major High Street institutions were
taking advantage of the fact that there has been a lack of proper competition since most
big building societies decided to convert to bank status. Societies which previously
worked to deliver the best possible rates to borrowers and savers now need to find
millions to pay dividends to shareholders.
He said: "Everyone was very happy to get the windfalls when the
building societies converted, but the old saying applies "There is no such thing as a
free lunch". Even if you did get free shares, you are paying for those over time with
higher mortgage rates or lower savings rates."
Latest figures show that new banks maintain a much wider gap than building
societies between the interest rates they charge to borrowers and the rates offered to
savers.
The mortgage situation is made worse by the fact that the cost of popular
fixed-rate loans has risen sharply in the last three months.
The new details are highly embarrassing for the banks, already under
investigation in a government-sponsored inquiry headed by the former telephone watchdog
Don Cruickshank. He and government ministers are thought to be sympathetic to accusations
that banks are guilty of overcharging, poor service and confusing consumers.
The banks will be further embarrassed by the fact they will soon be
revealing record UK profits for the first six months of this year.
The Consumers Association believes that the complex nature of
mortgages there are over 3,000 on the UK market makes it impossible for
homebuyers to make meaningful comparisons.
MPs and consumer groups fear that lenders are persuading customers to buy
unsuitable mortgages.
There have been claims that endowment mortgages are sold to almost a third
of borrowers because they deliver huge commissions to the salesman, rather than because
they are the best option for the customer.
Some fixed-rate deals carry lock-in clauses which force borrowers to move
later to high variable rates which wipe out any early saving. There are also concerns
about clauses requiring customers to buy expensive home contents and building insurance
policies.
Last night Labour MP Paul Flynn said the industry could not be trusted to
police itself, and should be put under the new Financial Services Authority. The Newport
West MP accused the Council of Mortgage Lenders, the industry body responsible for
self-regulation, of being self-serving and self-interested.
He said: "It is quite clear that people are being deceived into
taking mortgages that are more in the interest of the company than the customer. If action
is not taken to remedy the situation quickly the country faces a scandal of epic
proportions. This is not a trivial issue. People face financial ruin if they get the wrong
deal, it can make the difference between poverty and prosperity in later life."
Eddy Weatherill, chief executive of the Independent Bank Advisory Service,
said: "We must have a windfall tax. Hitting banks in the pocket is the only way to
get their attention. At the same time we need a proper watchdog system backed by the law,
to deliver proper competition between the banks. Currently, the banks are conning the
Government and the public into thinking a voluntary code of practice will do the
job."
The Government is understood to be sympathetic to calls for a proper
regulatory regime, providing there is sufficient evidence of mis-selling. Trading
Standards officers in 100 parliamentary constituencies are currently carrying out a
massive exercise to check the quality of advice to homebuyers. A pilot study in Suffolk
found serious problems.
A spokesman for the Council of Mortgage Lenders said that while banks were
being blamed for not passing on all interest rate cuts, they were rarely given credit for
their policy of not passing on high rises, as happened when base rates went over 15 per
cent. She said fixed-rate mortgages had risen because they are tied to the cost of funds
on the international money markets rather than to base rates.
The CML has insisted that its voluntary code of practice which
covers 97 per cent of lenders and carries a maximum compensation payment of £100,000
needs to be given time to show it can work.
The industry also says the cost of complying with the rules of a watchdog
like the FSA would have to be passed on to customers. |